Reason.com editor Nick Gillespie has an article at the The Daily Beast speculating that public focus on Ebola may increase support for the “right to try” movement. This movement supports passage of laws allowing patients with terminal diseases to use “drugs, devices, and treatments” that have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Campaign for Liberty Chairman Ron Paul is a champion of the right to try movement. In 2012, Dr. Paul introduced the Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act, which allowed terminally-ill patients to use drugs and other treatments not approved by the FDA.
Congressman Morgan Griffin (VA-9) has introduced the Compassionate Freedom Of Choice Act (HR 4475) in this Congress. Campaign for Liberty members interested in restoring the right of terminally-ill patients to make their own health care decisions should call their Representatives and ask they cosponsor the Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act (HR 4475).
Here is Dr. Paul’s official statement on the Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act:
INTRODUCTION OF COMPASSIONATE FREEDOM OF CHOICE ACT — (Extensions of Remarks – August 03, 2012)
—SPEECH OFHON. RON PAULOF TEXASIN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESTHURSDAY, AUGUST 2, 2012
Mr. PAUL. Mr. Speaker, I rise to introduce the “Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act.” This legislation allows terminally ill patients to use drugs, treatments and devices that have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if their physicians certify: (i) such patients have no other treatment options; and (ii) the patient executes written, informed consent that they are aware of any potential risks from the drug, device, or treatment.It is important to remember that this legislation only applies to otherwise terminally ill patients. Denying these patents a possible opportunity to cure their illness–or at least reduce their suffering–is nonsensical and cruel. The FDA’s approval process for drugs, devices, and treatments is costly and time consuming. Yet, time is the luxury terminally patients do not enjoy. So why should the FDA deny terminally-ill patients access to drugs, devices, and treatments that the patient’s physicians have determined represents the patent’s only possible chance for survival?For example, the FDA refused to allow Abigail Burroughs (who was diagnosed with head and neck cancer at the age of 19) access to the cancer drugs Iressa and Erbitux by the FDA. Never mind that a renowned oncologist at Johns Hopkins had determined there was a significant chance of saving her life if she could use these new drugs. With her only chance of survival denied by the federal government, Abigail passed away on June 9, 2001, at the age of twenty-one.
Another example of why this bill is necessary is the case of thirteen-year old Anna Tomalis, who enjoyed horseback riding and soccer until she was diagnosed with embryonal sarcoma. Chemotherapy and surgery failed to reverse the cancer, so Anna’s parents decided to try experimental drugs. They petitioned the FDA for approval to use Deforolimus, developed by Merk and ARIAD. Unfortunately, the FDA decided Ana was too sick to be admitted in Deforolimus’s clinical trials and did not grant her a “compassionate use” exemption until three weeks before she died.
Mr. Speaker, I have attached a list of other patients who were denied access to treatments by the FDA even though their doctors believed these treatments where the only option left to potentially save their lives. I ask my colleagues to help make sure that no more Americans with terminal disease are denied treatments simply because the FDA has decide these Americans are better off facing certain death than using an “unapproved” drug, treatment, or device. Please cosponsor the Compassionate Freedom of Choice Act.
Written by Norm Singleton
Read more at Campaign for Liberty