First it was the Thousand Year Reich. Now it’s the Global Caliphate. The pattern is as simple as it is stark. It always begins with the unruly rabble-rousers. A curiosity at first, then a police problem, then a raised governmental eyebrow. Eventually, the rabble-rousers attract more rabble. Now the jails begin to fill. Then the streets. There is violence. Then the sympathizers appear, making the case that, well, when you think about it, the growing rabble has a point or two or three. Money starts to flow in from supporters as well as the sympathizers. The rabble rousers finally get organized. The media gets involved, with the rabble getting their hands on communications capabilities and attracting attention from other media not their own. The latter media follows along, ignoring the first stirrings, then not, then with some leaping over the side into the deep water with the rabble’s “rising star.” And don’t forget the foreigners. They are always there to be attracted, supplying everything from money to support in their own country, when not simply abandoning their own country altogether and joining the cause.
And rising stars? That is exactly the way the leaders of these rabble-rousers are presented, even if the terminology is not used. Sometimes these rising stars come in two personas — the intellectuals and the activists. Sometimes? They are both in one.
If there is anything to learn from this historical pattern, it would be that Mistake Number One is to not take what’s happening very seriously and do something about it. As then-Obama White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan was clearly advising an agreeable President Obama not to do something about Islamic radicalism. In case you missed it, there was this jewel awhile back from Brennan — who is now the director of the CIA. Said Brennan of ISIS:
We are not going to organize our counterterrorism policies against a feckless delusion that is never going to happen. We are not going to elevate these thugs and their murderous aspirations into something larger than they are.
Ahhhh yes. The feckless delusions of thugs. Just one no big deal. Unless, of course, one realizes the world has been here before. With ISIS and all those Islamic radicals making it perfectly plain that in their quest for a global caliphate they are following the old, well-worn pattern of history. A pattern that once produced the vision of the “thousand year Reich.”
The classic text here would be The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by William L. Shirer, the late radio journalist for CBS and various newspapers of the day who began reporting on the Nazis from his post in 1920s Germany. Shirer describes the Nazis of the early 1920s precisely as thugs with a feckless delusion of world domination. In Shirer’s words the early Nazis were “uniformed rowdies” whose bullying tactics frequently landed them in jail. In the day, to borrow from Mr. Obama’s description of ISIS, the early Nazis and their “uniformed rowdies” were seen as a “manageable problem.”
But over time the Nazis would exploit the use of communications. Then, with money coming in, the party options were still primitive — but they maximized those options. The party convinced a donor to help them acquire “a run-down newspaper badly in debt, the Voelkischer Beobachter, an anti-Semitic gossip sheet which appeared twice a week.” By 1923 it was a daily, “thus giving (the Nazis) the prerequisite of all German political parties, a daily newspaper in which to preach the party’s gospels.”
Among these rowdies was a young ex-German army corporal from Austria who soon began to get attention. Writes Shirer:
In the summer of 1921 the rising young agitator who had shown such surprising talents not only as an orator but as an organizer and a propagandist took over the undisputed leadership of the party.
The new young leader possessed a “ruthlessness and tactical shrewdness.” He used every tool at his disposal to advance his cause. It was Hitler who focused on the purchase of a newspaper to spread the party line. On one early occasion his tactics could be as cleverly benign as a libel suit over an unfavorable pamphlet published by early rivals, which he settled by demanding a public repudiation and “dictatorial powers” over the fledgling party of “rowdies.” By July, 1921 this was formally established as the “leadership principle,” eventually to be “the law first of the Nazi Party and then of the Third Reich.”
sent by the embassy to Munich to check on an obscure political agitator by the name of Adolph Hitler and his newly founded National Socialist Labor Party…. a dozen political leaders in Bavaria (telling) him that Hitler was a rising star and his movement a rapidly growing political force.
Smith would return to Berlin and write a report warning — in 1922 — that while young Hitler was, in Shirer’s words, “scarcely known outside Munich” he was — Smith’s words — “a marvelous demagogue” whose group of “rowdies” had now “acquired political influence quite disproportionate to its actual numerical strength…”
Written by: THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR– continue reading at