World Trade Organization to force Taiwanese citizens to eat radioactive food from Fukushima

(NaturalNews) Japan could turn to the globalist World Trade Organization to force Taiwan to import seafood and other products that might be tainted with radiation from the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster.

In recent days, the government of Taiwan began imposing stricter rules on inspecting food products imported from Japan that might have originated from areas exposed to radioactive fallout from the crippled plant. That prompted the Japanese government to warn that it could call on the WTO for a trade ruling unless Taiwan eases up on its restrictions.

Reuters reports that under the new Taiwanese rules, only foods with a government place-of-origin certificate will be permitted in the country. In addition, certain items from specific regions in Japan will have to undergo radiation testing before they are given access to Taiwan’s markets.

Reuters further reported:

Taiwan’s Food and Drug Administration said the latest enforcement was in line with radiation safety management practices that other countries have put in place on Japanese food imports following the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.

The administration said this “is necessary to protect the safety of food consumption” for the people of Taiwan.

However, the Japanese government has protested the decision. Tokyo has warned it could file a protest with the World Trade Organization that could only deepen the conflict with Taipei.

“Japan’s government would like to urge Taiwan to scrap or ease the import restrictions based on scientific perspective,” Yoshihide Suga, Japan’s top government spokesman, said at a news conference on Friday in Tokyo that was reported by Reuters.

Hundreds of tainted products discovered

His comments were similar to those made by Agricultural Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi a few days ago, in which the latter warned that Tokyo would get a ruling from the WTO if Taiwan did not reverse its course and get rid of the new regulations.

In January, rice from Fukushima passed radiation checks for the first time since the plant became crippled by a tsunami caused by a massive earthquake in March 2011.

Earlier this year, Taiwanese officials claimed that some 200 food products from Japan that were sold on the island originally came from radiation-infested regions near the plant but were mislabeled as having come from some other region of Japan.

That caused consternation among Taiwanese health officials at the time, who indicated they believed there might have been some intentional effort to mislabel Japanese food products, including Chinese-language labels that listed different places of origin and were attached to mask the products’ original Japanese labels.

Reuters also noted:

Taiwanese media reported in March that food products, from the Japanese prefectures of Fukushima, Ibaraki, Gumma and Chiba, which were banned in Taiwan since March 2011, had crept into local supermarkets due to the mislabelling.

The ruling is substantial because Taiwan is the third-largest market for Japanese exports of food and other agricultural products, as well as forestry and fishery products.

As for the WTO, the UN agency recently issued a ruling favoring Canadian and Mexican livestock producers by requiring a change in American law regarding country-of-origin labeling that lists where livestock and poultry were produced and slaughtered.

Is radioactive food already in stores?

As NaturalNews reported in July 2012, that ruling stemmed from a case originally filed by the two countries in 2012. Because of its treaty association with the WTO, the U.S. is bound to certain international trade rules that supersede its own sovereign laws.

“These rules prohibit WTO member countries from engaging in so-called unfair trade practices that discriminate against other WTO member countries,” wrote Ethan Huff for NaturalNews.

In April, we reported there were also concerns that food grown, caught or processed in the contaminated Fukushima region might already be on store shelves around the world.

“I suspect what has happened in Taiwan might well have already happened in the UK. Intermediary supply chain middlemen can buy food in bulk and package and label as they like – before shipping them to the UK,” said Alastair Marke of the British food safety consultancy.

Sources:

http://www.channelnewsasia.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.independent.co.uk

Written by J. D. Heyes
Learn more: Natural News

The Vaccine Racket: Amazing infographic reveals financial connections behind criminally-run vaccine industry

(NaturalNews) Today we are officially releasing our Vaccine Racket Infographic which details the financial connections behind the criminally-run vaccine industry. (Tweet #VaccineRacket)

image

Click here for a full-sized version of the infographic.

The infographic documents the nefarious players of the vaccine industry: the mainstream media, the CDC, deceitful vaccine propagandists like Paul Offit, the secretive vaccine court, the cover-up of vaccine-injured children, mainstream media propaganda that programs the public to worship vaccines, and much more.

I first sketched out this Vaccine Racket Infographic after observing the behavior of all the key players in the contrived Disneyland measles outbreak, which was used as a public panic springboard to launch a series of government-enforced vaccine mandate legislation efforts across the country. Every player in the vaccine racket played its role in that “medical theater” episode, displaying uncanny coordination and a well-funded ability to gin up the kind of fear mongering that’s only pursued when corporate profits are at stake.

Here’s a scaled-down edition of the infographic. Click it to view a larger image:

image

Another CDC-linked fugitive from justice, Poul Thorsen

While you’re examining the runaway criminality of the vaccine racket, don’t forget the CDC-linked fugitive from justice known as Poul Thorsen, who absconded with millions of dollars in federal vaccine research funds (after faking vaccine research for the CDC to downplay the links between vaccines and autism).

Click here for the PDF infographic detailing Thorsen’s web of fraud. See thumbnail here:

Also see these related articles:

Key CDC scientist who downplayed vaccine-autism connection is now fleeing from justice

CDC scientific fraud: an update on Dr. Poul Thorsen who authored fraudulent study ‘disproving’ vaccine-autism connection and stole millions of dollars

Central Figure in CDC Vaccine Safety Studies Investigated for Fraud

CDC vaccine scientist who downplayed links to autism indicted by DOJ in alleged fraud scheme

Written by Mike Adams
Learn more: Natural News

HILLARY EMAIL INDICATES ANOTHER AMERICAN WITH SLAIN AMBASSADOR?

Message released by State Department refers to 2 bodies

An unexplained Hillary Clinton email released last Friday by the State Department speaks of two bodies being recovered in the immediate aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack.

It is not clear to which two bodies the email was referring.

The reference raises questions about a previous document, which, as WND was first to report, claimed that another American, aside from Ambassador Christopher Stevens, was being treated at the Libyan hospital where Stevens died.

The batch of Clinton emails released by the State Department last week contains one dated Sept. 12, 2012, at 6:23 a.m., presumably Eastern Time, one day after the attack.

The email was from senior Clinton aide Cheryl Mills. It was titled “We recovered both bodies overnite and are looking at getting at statement out at 7am.”

The text of the email was entirely redacted.

The two bodies could have been the two CIA contractors who were killed during a battle at the CIA annex, Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty.

Get “The Real Benghazi Story,” about the scandal that’s “bigger than Watergate” at a special $4.95 price today!

Stevens was presumably alone at the hospital, while Information Officer Sean Smith was killed in the initial assault.

But WND previously reported a four-page incident report allegedly written by a private contractor that provided security to the U.S. compound in Benghazi claimed there was another American with Stevens at the Benghazi Medical Center hospital.

The authorship of the report is in question.

The second American was described in the report by the private Blue Mountain Group as being “black” and shot in the hand. The report says the man was presumed to be “one of the ambassador’s close protection team as both were black.”

No mention in State report of anyone with Stevens

The State Department’s Accountability Review Board report, or ARB, detailed what it claimed was the official version of events during and after the attack. The ARB report does not mention any other American at the hospital with Stevens.

The ARB report states only that Stevens’ body was transported from the hospital to the Benghazi airport. The ARB does not describe how Stevens’ body was released from a hospital said to be under Ansar Al-Sharia’s control.

The Blue Mountain report raises questions about whether any other American was present at the hospital.

The State Department confirmed the Blue Mountain report leaked to the news media in 2013 matches the version sent to the U.S. government by the Blue Mountain Group.

The Washington Post reported the incident report was written by the man interviewed by “60 Minutes” in November 2014 and identified by the pseudonym Morgan Jones.

Jones is the author of a book on Benghazi that was recalled following questions about the veracity of its claims, including contradictions about the author’s whereabouts during the attack.

Written by AARON KLEIN
Read more at WND

Leading Islamic voice calls for reconquering Jerusalem

Erdogan: ‘Ask Allah to restore the al-Aksa’

Turkish President Erdogan makes eerie presence at party convention 2014

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has called on his countrymen to refocus on the Ottoman goal of re-conquering Jerusalem for Islam and uniting Shia and Sunni tribes for that same mission.

In a speech that got almost no coverage in the Western media, Erdogan talked about invading and reconquering Jerusalem, according to an article in the Anadolu Agency of Turkey.

“We Muslims lost our aim to head towards Jerusalem,” he told throngs of adoring Turks while in the state of Erzincan in central Turkey, according to a translation by Walid Shoebat. “The water of our eyes froze making us blind, and our hearts that was destined to beat for Jerusalem is now instead conditioned for rivalry being in a state of war with each other.”

Erdogan was in the city to promote numerous service projects, but the speech focused on Jerusalem.

“When you mention the word ascension, the first thing that comes to mind is Jerusalem and al-Aqsa Mosque,” he said, referring to the mosque that sits on the Temple Mount.

The Mount is controlled by Arab Muslim Waqf officials, who do not allow Jews to pray except at the Western Wall. But apparently Erdogan is not satisfied with this arrangement. He told his countrymen to ask “Allah to restore the Al-Aqsa Mosque to be re-owned by Muslims.”

Written by LEO HOHMANN
Read more at WND

SCHOOL CHILDREN ARRESTED AND CRIMINALLY CHARGED FOR INCITING A RIOT — FOR A FOOD FIGHT

A number of students at San Antonio’s McCollum High School were charged with inciting a riot for their involvement in a food fight that took place at the school this Thursday just after noon.

“It was a rowdy food fight. There were plates all over the floor, and corn in the air and some milk cartons as well,” student Adrian Toscano told KSAT-TV.

For some reason, the staff at the school was not able to control the situation, and they ended up calling the police, who came in and arrested ten students for inciting a riot.

“Inciting a riot is because there was 900 kids in the cafeteria when the food fight started. Everybody rushed out, and it caused somewhat of a stampede out there,” district spokeswoman Leslie Garza told KSAT-TV.

Parents should reconsider public schools for a variety of different reasons, but now it has reached the point where sending your children to public school could become a potential liability. Any case of “kids being kids” can quickly escalate to a violent or legally hazardous situation.

As we reported last week, mother and substitute teacher Julie Giles was arrested this week because her son had too many unexcused absences from public school.

A brief and understandably shakey video captured some of the “criminals” in action.

Written by JOHN VIBES
FREE THOUGHT PROJECT

Report: Terrorist Nuke Attack May Be Carried Out Inside the United States in Next 12 Months

Finding the scientists to build such a weapon, whether dirty or actual, wouldn’t be all that difficult

With nuclear material having been stolen on multiple occasions in Mexico, and close terrorist ties to intelligence organizations in the middle east, it appears that if an organization was committed to acquiring nuclear material they could do so. Finding the scientists to build such a weapon, whether dirty or actual, wouldn’t be all that difficult. Moreover, smuggling such a device into the U.S. is possible, as evidenced by a 2011 report which confirms that at least one nuclear weapon of mass destruction wasseized as it entered the United States.

According to a report from Zero Hedge, such a plan may be in the works over the next twelve months, as the Islamic State claims it may be actively pursuing a nuclear weapon intended for detonation on American soil.

Three weeks after the first supposed attack by Islamic State supporters in the US, in which two ISIS “soldiers” wounded a security guard before they were killed in Garland, Texas, the time has come to raise the fear stakes.

In an article posted in the terrorist group’s English-language online magazine Dabiq (which as can be see below seems to have gotten its design cues straight from Madison Avenue and is just missing glossy pages filled with ‘scratch and sniff’ perfume ads ) ISIS claimed that it has enoughmoney to buy a nuclear weapon from Pakistan and “carry out an attack inside the United States next year.”

In the article, the ISIS columnist said the weapon could be smuggled into the United States via its southern border with Mexico.

Curiously, the author of the piece is John Cantlie, a British photojournalist who was abducted by ISIS in 2012 and has been held hostage by the organization ever since; he has appeared in several videos since his kidnapping and criticized Western powers.

As the Telegraph notes, “Mr Cantlie, whose fellow journalist hostages have all either been released or beheaded, has appeared in the group’s propaganda videos and written previous pieces. In his latest work, presumed to be written under pressure but in his hall-mark style combining hyperbole, metaphor and sarcasm, he says that President Obama’s policies for containing Isil have demonstrably failed and increased the risk to America.”

Cantlie describes the following “hypothetical” scenario in Dabiq :

Let me throw a hypothetical operation onto the table. The Islamic State has billions of dollars in the bank, so they call on their wilayah in Pakistan to purchase a nuclear device through weapons dealers with links to corrupt officials in the region. 

The weapon is then transported overland until it makes it to Libya, where the muj?hid?n move it south to Nigeria. Drug shipments from Columbia bound for Europe pass through West Africa, so moving other types of contraband from East to West is just as possible.

The nuke and accompanying mujahadin arrive on the shorelines of South America and are transported through the  porous borders of Central America before arriving in Mexico and up to the border with the United States.

From there it’s just a quick hop through a smuggling tunnel and hey presto, they’re mingling with another 12 million “illegal” aliens in America with a nuclear bomb in the trunk of their car.

Cantlie continues:

Perhaps such a scenario is far-fetched but it’s the sum of all fears for Western intelligence agencies and it’s infinitely more possible today than it was just one year ago. And if not a nuke, what about a few thousand tons of ammonium nitrate explosive?

That’s easy enough to make. The Islamic State make no secret of the fact they have every intention of attacking America on its home soil and they’re not going to mince about with two muj?hid?n taking down a dozen casualties if it originates from the Caliphate. They’ll be looking to do something big, something that would make any past operation look like a squirrel shoot, and the more groups that pledge allegiance the more possible it becomes to pull off something truly epic.

Remember, all of this has happened in less than a year. How more dangerous will be the lines of communication and supply a year on from today? If the West completely failed to spot the emergence of the Islamic State and then the allies who so quickly pledged allegiance to it from around the world, what else of massive significance are they going to miss next?

One can, of course, debate just how much the West “failed to spot the emergence of ISIS” considering it was not only the CIA which initially trainedthe terrorist organization in Jordan in 2012, but according to recently declassified Pentagon documents, the US was well aware the outcome its attempt to overthrow Syria’s Assad would have on the region, in the process “creating” ISIS, aka al Qaeda 2.0.

In other words, even the “hypothetical operation” involving a nuclear attack on US soil would implicitly have the blessing of the US government. Which, considering the way the stock market surges every time the US economy deteriorates further on its way towards recession, probably means that a mushroom cloud appearing in some major US metropolitan area is just what the E-mini algos would need to send the S&P500 limit up.

Source: Zero Hedge

We have definitive confirmation via declassified documents that the Islamic State is a creation of the U.S. Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency, and their influence across the middle east was predicted well in advance of anyone ever having heard the name ISIS or ISIL. We also know that false flag operations, such as the German Reichstag fire of 1933, are often used by governments (or rogue elements within a government) to implement changes to existing political and social paradigms.

It could be that this nuclear threat is a psychological operation designed to elicit fear in the populace so that they go along willingly with legislative actions like the Patriot Act which further erode individual rights in the name of protecting us from terrorism, or to justify large scale military operations on U.S. soil, including but not limited to this summer’s Jade Helm exercises.

Or, certainly within the realm of possibility, is the notion that at some point a rogue terror element, the origination and loyalty of which makes absolutely no difference in the end, is planning on detonating a nuclear device on U.S. soil.

Perhaps this is one reason for why the elite are rapidly investing in secret hideaways. Perhaps they know it’s time to start exiting large metropolitan areas ahead of whatever is coming. Perhaps it all starts with a bang and a mushroom cloud, soon followed by panic, riots, looting, and of course, the unprecedented domesticmilitary response that would be necessitated by a widespread breakdown of civil order.

We can only speculate, but the fact is that another large-scale attack on U.S. soil would usher in a new era in the Land of the Free.

Admittedly, we have delved deep into the rabbit hole of conspiracy theory, but we leave the reader the following quote to consider within the context of this current threat:

The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor. 

Project for a New American Century, 2000 (PDF Link)
Signed by Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, et. al.

At the very least the American people are being psychologically conditioned to accept their own enslavement. At worst, an event such as this would be used to plunge the world into the next great war.

Written by Mac Slavo- SHTFplan
SHTFplan.com

History In the Making: The Sides Are Being Drawn for the Coming Civil War

Since the revelations regarding the intrusiveness and the scope of Jade Helm, many now believe that this country is plunging head first into a state of revolution/civil war.

The Case for Civil War

image

image

How many of you believe that a planned currency collapse coupled with the implementation of a brutal martial law and gun confiscation will be the trigger events which will incite the coming revolution? This remains the leading candidate for the unfolding of a civil war. On May 24th, I interviewed Stewart Rhodes of Oathkeepers, and he believes that an economic collapse will set off the conflict and he also believes, as I do, that ISIS will wreak havoc in this country the midst of the chaos caused by the failure of the dollar. We both believe that under the cover of this chaos, we will see political dissidents extracted as per the intent of the Jade Helm exercise. It will be at this point, that the sides will be definitively drawn in the upcoming conflict.

Many of us in the Independent Media believe that this is the likely scenario that will very soon turn this country into the most dangerous country on the face of the earth. It might behoove us to look a little closer at the nature of revolution in order to predict where all of this is likely headed. Although I personally oppose the use of violence as a political tool, in the present political climate, I see no way to stem the tide of unthinkable brutality and violence which seems imminent. It is in this mindset that I set about to research the topic of revolution and this series of articles reflects the results of the research. And as a result of past and common patterns of revolution, it appears as if a clear picture is beginning to emerge and whether, or not, we choose to admit where Jade Helm will take us, the government is already practicing for what appears to ba likely.

image

On March 27, under the auspices of DHS, Special Operations forces practiced political dissident extraction drills in Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Many people took this as a personal declaration of war against the American people.

In an email from a forced Lt. General retiree, courtesy of President Obama, he provided some clues on where he believes the coming conflict is headed.

“…With modern antiaircraft systems (mobile and man portable) air power will be all but useless. What we will see is a ground war, city by city, street by street. Additionally what is coming will be unlike any civil war in history, it will be very personal, the government will call the Patriots forces terrorists and traitors, they will arrest, intern, torture and murder suspected terrorists families, this will result in bloody reprisals which will start a vicious cycle lasting for years”.

What kind of conflict is being described here? In order to answer that question, we must first examine the “Four levels of warfare”.

Four Levels of Warfare

Most military strategists identify four levels of conflict; (1) nuclear war is the trump card of all conflict; (2) conventional warfare; (3) guerrilla warfare; and, (4) terrorism.

It is safe to say that if our country does indeed descend into revolution, nuclear war will not come into play, for if it did, there would be nothing to rule over in the aftermath.

The United States has already witnessed civil war of a conventional nature. In the 1860’s as two mighty armies of that era locked horns in what proved to be the conflict in which America suffered her greatest loss of life. In the Civil War, both sides had equivalent weaponry and as a result, employed conventional tactics.

Initially, the coming civil war could very well consist of one American unit facing off against another as we saw in the civil war. However, the losing side would quickly resort to the use of guerrilla warfare tactics.

At the present time and given the disparity of technology and resources between the people the globalist controlled forces of the government, a conventional war would prove to be a disaster for the rebel forces. The likely mode of the revolutionary war conflict facing the people of the United States is that it will consist of either guerrilla warfare or terrorism.

Guerrilla Warfare Or Terrorism?

image

You are the terrorist and DHS has been practicing.

Terrorism is the least preferred option by any insurgent group. With terrorism, there is absolutely no hope of final victory because territory is never occupied. For that reason, nobody aspires to engage in terrorism if they have a viable alternative and the American people do have a choice given how well armed we are. However, terrorism arising out of a defeated guerrilla force is a distinct possibility as it would represent American guerrilla’s fallback position should they be defeated. Subsequently, does the MIAC Report which labeled Libertarians, Constitutionalists, Second Amendment Supporters, Ron Paul Supporters, Veterans and now Christians as domestic terrorists, make a little more sense as to why DHS made these bold proclamations? DHS understands and has demonstrated their understanding of these facts and has also prepared for what I just wrote about in the previous paragraph.

The Veterans Administration estimates that there are approximately 21.5 million veterans living in the United States. We also live in a country with over 300 million privately owned guns. These combined factors point clearly to a guerrilla war being the preferred and necessary mode of combat which will likely be visited upon this country.

What Is Guerrilla Warfare?

Guerrilla warfare, for most of human history, is not new. Tribal war, which traditionally pits one guerrilla force against another, is the oldest form of warfare. The new “conventional” form of warfare, which pits guerrillas against “conventional” forces, is more recent as it arose in Mesopotamia 5,000 years ago.

The good news for future American freedom fighters is that guerrilla war has been getting more successful since 1945, but unfortunately guerrilla fighters still lose most of the time. An analysis of past conflicts featuring guerrilla war, reveals that only 25% of guerrilla forces, out of 443 such conflicts since 1775, were successful. The government prevailed almost 64% of the time with the remainder of the conflicts ended in a stalemate. Conversely, since the end of WWII, the percentage of success for guerrilla forces has indeed gone up to 39.6%. Yet that still means that government forces have continued to prevail 51% of the time. When the American people engage in a guerrilla war in the upcoming years, the people have less than a 40% chance of success. However, if some retired military leadership estimates are correct, a sizeable number of U.S. troops will join the American people, this will greatly enhance the chances of success.

Length of Guerrilla Wars

Guerrilla wars are rarely short and as a result do not favor the American culture and our collective psyche of instant gratification. When Americans flip the switch on the wall, we expect the light to come on. Will Americans set aside their entitlements as well as their entrenched soft lifestyle and rise to the occasion? Only time will tell.

The Vietnamese culture with an external locus of control predominating the people where the group is more important than the individual is the perfect mindset for guerrilla fighters. This could prove to be the American rebels biggest challenge because guerrilla warfare is not something that one does like driving over a speed bump. It is a way of life, a very hard way of life filled with misery, extreme sacrifice and unspeakable losses.

image

General Vo Nugyen Giap, the architect of the Viet Cong strategy.

For my money, the best guerrilla fighters in the modern era were the Viet Cong in which Vietnamese people were involved in some form of guerrilla war from 1942-1975. After the Americans invaded Vietnam, the forces in the north had a saying, “born in the north, to die in the south.” There were nearly two generations of Vietnamese people in which war was an unavoidable part of life. What General Westmoreland and LBJ failed to recognize was that in order to defeat and totally subdue the Vietnamese people, the Americans would have had to have engaged in unspeakable genocide. Despite the fact that the US won every single battle of the war, the Vietnamese rebels were never going to give up. Do we Americans have that same tenacity to persevere like the Vietnamese?

Prior to WWII, guerrilla wars lasted an average of seven years. Following WWII, guerrilla conflicts lasted an average of 10 years. Will Americans embrace the tenets and sacrifices of guerrilla war and can it ever become a way of life? For this to happen, I believe that conditions would have to be unspeakably horrendous for America to embrace a conflict under these conditions. I think that things would have to be so bad, so completely genocidal, that fighting and dying would be the only viable alternative for America in order to embrace guerrilla warfare as a way of life. What I am saying here is that we are a very soft people. However, Jade Helm with the use of Special Operations Forces designed to extract “Red Listed” political dissidents, could push many Americans over the top.

How Close Is the Inevitable Conflict?

Successful guerrilla leaders such as Lawrence of Arabia, Mao, Castro and Giap all concur that there are three phases of any guerrilla war. However, before the phases can unfold there are two preconditions which must be me

image

t.

The first condition which is a prerequisite for guerrilla war, is based upon the fact that there has to be a decisive battle for the belief systems of the people as a whole. The globalists have invested billions of dollars in order to dominate the mainstream media. On the other side is the Independent Media. Both sides are vying for control of the belief systems of the country. Winning the hearts and minds of the people is critical to success. The Viet Cong understood this principle and the winner of the coming conflict is likely to be the one that can apply this lesson of history to modern times.

There are two very distinct ideologies playing out today in the court of public opinion. On one hand, the future rebels are adept at exposing the loss of national sovereignty and civil liberties every chance they get. Conversely, the globalist dominated media is spending billions of dollars to convince the masses that there is no such thing as a conspiracy theory and despite some governmental incompetence, the government loves and protects its people. And the globalists are being somewhat effective. Have you ever noticed that when you are describing a globalist inspired conspiracy such as what happened at Benghazi, and no matter how well documented your position is, that your audience frequently responds with the globalist-created mantra “You must be one of these conspiracy theorists?” Our facts are rarely attacked because they are accurate, but the idea of the existence of any kind of conspiracy is what is challenged. This kind of programming coming from the media is brilliant and effective. Who is winning this war of words? The jury is still out, but the unmistakable conclusion is that the ideological battle lines for the upcoming conflict have clearly been drawn.

The globalists sell the sheep on the notion that we have to control you to protect you (from a threat of our creation), and the other side is saying “we will take our chances, give us freedom.”

The second precondition which must be met prior to descending into guerrilla war consists of both sides engaging in an arms race. In response to the Obama administration’s threat of seizing our guns for the false flag events of the Aurora Batman massacre and Sandy Hook, Americans went on a gun-buying frenzy which continues to this day. DHS has engaged in their own arms buildup as they have purchased 2.2 billion rounds of ammunition to go with 2700 new armored personnel carriers and that is not all. The federal government has invested in 30,000 drones, super soldier robots and intelligence gathering techniques which are mind-blowing.

In summary, the American people and their government have engaged in an arms race very similar in nature to two rival countries preparing to go to war.

Conclusion

The preconditions for armed conflict and the likelihood that the conflict will be guerrilla is very likely, but whether the American people would tolerate total enslavement in lieu of rebellion is very much in doubt.

Emerging from the discussion in the next part in this series is the discovery of the fact that there are three overlapping phases to guerrilla war and it will be a shocking surprise to all of us as to how far along this country is in relation to these three phases. All that is needed is the right trigger event (i.e. Jade Helm extractions) and that will be discussed in the next part as well.

Written by Dave Hodges
The Common Sense Show

NOTE: Special permission given by Dave Hodges allows us to submit his articles in their entirety on CHRISTIAN PATRIOTS.ORG

Please visit our Christian Patriots Facebook Page

Radical Leftist group smears veterans, Oath Keepers, and patriots as ‘extremists’

(NaturalNews) Men and women who serve America in the armed forces are some of the most honorable, selfless citizens we have, but to one left-wing hatemonger, they are among the most dangerous and should not be trusted.

The professional “radical” feels the same about “patriots” — men and women who revere the Constitution, the rule of law and equal justice for all. Ditto for “Oath Keepers” — an organization made up of current and former military, police and first responders “who pledge to fulfill the oath all military and police take to ‘defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic'” (Oath Keepers make that pledge to the Constitution, not to politicians).

To lawyer Mark Potok, the hack and Leftist activist who has long been associated with the hard-Left group Southern Poverty Law Center, which bills itself as “an American nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation,” Americans who stand up for our founding principles are the enemy.

Yet, to the notoriously left-wing mainstream media, Potok is a regular, an “expert” who is generally trotted out whenever the subject turns to “right-wing extremism,” which is often.

Patriots are dangerous?

As noted by NewsBusters.org, a division of the non-profit Media Research Center, it doesn’t matter that Potok sees such extremism under every rock; it doesn’t matter that he has been consistently wrong about those he claims are enemies of the State; it doesn’t matter that his “evidence” is non-existent and based primarily on what he thinks and believes — the MSM features him often because he’s good at what he does: spreading hate, propaganda and misinformation.

“The fact that he is consistently wrong about, well, just about everything — from the political views of the supposed right wingers to the supposedly violent nature of conservative groups to the mere presence of violent crime — does not seem to dissuade Old Media from using him to smear conservatives,” Newsbusters.org notes.

Potok’s most recent cause celebre is the Oath Keepers organization, whose members have merely pledged not to follow any orders that would usurp the constitutional rights of all Americans of all races, ethnicity, religions, beliefs and sexual preferences (real radical stuff!).

In an interview recently with Newsweek for a piece entitled “A Surge of Hate” (easy to figure out the tone of this piece of “objective journalism, huh?), Potok painted Oath Keepers with his usual hateful broad brush, declaring the group to be “a particularly worrisome example of the ‘patriot’ revival.”

“Hack not an expert”

As Newsbusters.org notes further:

The SPLC defines a ‘patriot’ group not as one that is, you know, patriotic, but as a group full of wacko conspiracy theorists who think the federal government is trying to impose a so-called New World Order, often with one global government.

As the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) — an organization that has called for immigration limits and the enforcement of current immigration law — has stated, Potok’s hateful ire has also been directed at so-called “hate groups,” a term Potok’s organization contrived, which is essentially any organization that does not toe the left-wing ideological line on any political issue.

“The latest ‘hate group’ report issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) demonstrates once again that the SPLC is neither a reliable source of information nor an ‘objective observer’ in the immigration policy debate. The latest report issued by the SLPC is long on rhetoric and allegations and short of facts,” FAIR notes in its analysis of the SPLC’s latest broadside against Americans whose only crime is that they love their country and its constitutional form of government.

Of course, for Potok, only right-leaning, conservative movements and organizations are a threat — not left-leaning groups that actually commit acts of terror like members of Greenpeace, the Animal Liberation Front and the Earth First! movement.

That makes him a “hack,” not an “expert.”

Sources:

http://newsbusters.org

http://www.splcreport.com

http://oathkeepers.org

http://www.newsweek.com

http://www.theguardian.com

Written by J. D. Heyes
Learn more: Natural News

Democrat Party copies communist manifesto to compose new ‘Progressive Agenda’

(NaturalNews) There have been claims made by conservatives that the Democrat Party’s hard-left shift since Barack Obama became president is indicative of its slide toward socialism, but some observers say the party’s shift is even further leftward than that, and that the party really embraces full-blown communism.

As reported by WorldNetDaily, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, who has expressed his affinity for Marxist figures and socialism, recently unveiled a 13-point “Progressive Agenda” that is being sold in some political circles as the Leftist version of former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s “Contract with America.”

As WND noted:

The aim is for the “Progressive Agenda” to become the basis for the Democratic Party’s main economic policies, including those of its 2016 presidential candidate.

De Blasio has compared his plan to the “Contract with America,” a document released by the Republican Party during the 1994 congressional election and drawn up by future House Speaker Newt Gingrich to serve as the GOP policy agenda.

The similarities can’t be ignored

The news site went on to point out that most of the 13 points in de Blasio’s agenda align rather nicely with the manifestos and literature produced by the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) and the Socialist Party USA (SPUSA).

The full plan, which is called “The Progressive Agenda to Combat Income Inequality,” can be read at the new agenda’s website.

As compiled by WND, a comparison of the new agenda with literature from the other two leftist parties follows:

Progressive Agenda: “Raise the federal minimum wage, so that it reaches $15/hour, while indexing it to inflation.”

SPUSA: “We call for a minimum wage of $15 per hour, indexed to the cost of living.”

CPUSA: This party calls for “struggles for peace, equality for the racially and nationally oppressed, equality for women job creation programs, increased minimum wage. … Even with ultra-right control of the Federal government, peoples legislative victories, such as increasing the minimum wage, can be won on an issue-by-issue basis locally, statewide, and even nationally.”

Progressive Agenda: “Reform the National Labor Relations Act, to enhance workers’ right to organize and rebuild the middle class.”

SPUSA: “The Socialist Party stands for the right of all workers to organize, for worker control of industry through the democratic organization of the workplace.”

CPUSA: “One of the most crucial ways of increasing the strength and unity of the working class as a whole is organizing the unorganized. Working-class unity depends on uniting all the diverse sectors of the multiracial, multinational working class in the U.S. … Speeding up the organization of unorganized workers is one of the most important challenges to labor and all progressive forces.”

Progressive Agenda: “Pass comprehensive immigration reform to grow the economy and protect against exploitation of low-wage workers.”

SPUSA: “We defend the rights of all immigrants to education, health care, and full civil and legal rights and call for an unconditional amnesty program for all undocumented people. We oppose the imposition of any fees on those receiving amnesty. We call for full citizenship rights upon demonstrating residency for six months.”

CPUSA: The “struggle for immigrant rights is a key component of the struggle for working class unity in our country today.”

And so forth. You can see the full comparison here.

Communists have long sought to bring America down

As conspiratorial as it might sound, the notion of “fundamentally transforming” the United States from a representative republic that embraces free-market capitalism and individual liberty is nothing new.

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev, who provoked the Cuban missile crisis during President John F. Kennedy’s administration, long ago predicted that America would submit to communism, and without ever being “forced” into it by the (now-defunct) USSR or any other country.

“We can’t expect the American people to jump from capitalism to communism, but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of socialism, until they awaken one day to find that they have communism,” says a quote widely attributed to him.

Whether it is completely accurate or not, the sentiment is certainly spot-on, for, today, socialists and other Left-leaning politicians in the Democrat Party openly embrace socialist and communist policies and propaganda, as evidenced in this recent Washington Post story describing Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton’s campaign strategy.

Sources:

http://www.wnd.com

http://progressiveagenda.us

http://www.frontpagemag.com

http://www.washingtonpost.com

Written by J. D. Heyes
Learn more: Natural News

Remembering Those on Memorial Day

Memorial Day 2015. Let us remember all of those who lost there lives in defending the former republic.

Let us remember those who’ve gave their lives fighting for what they were told was for freedom.

Let us remember the brave men and women who were sent in harm’s way by tyrants and never came home, fighting wars based on power and greed.

Let us pray for the families of those who lost loved ones and give them comfort this Memorial Day.

image

John 15:13
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

Daniel Crane
Christian Patriots

Christians and Patriots spreading the truth

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,235 other followers

%d bloggers like this: